Notre Dame of Paris and the Courtyard of the Gentiles

John 3:16

 16For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

=================================

per·ish

-to die or be destroyed through violence, privation, etc.: toperish in an earthquake.
-to pass away or disappear: an age of elegance that hasforever perished.
-to suffer destruction or ruin: His valuable paintings perishedin the fire.
-perish the thought, may it never happen: used facetiously oras an afterthought of foreboding.
Origin: 
1200–50; Middle English perissen  < Old French periss-
,  long stem of perir  < Latin perīre  to perish, literally, go through, spendfully, equivalent to per- per-  + īre  to go
========================================================================== 

Parrish

meaning and name origin

Parrish  is of Old French origin, and the meaning of Parrish is “ecclesiastical locality”. Place name. A parish is the area under the care of one pastor or priest. Parrish has 3 variant forms: ParishParris and Parriss. For more information, see also the related name Paris.

===================================================

Why was the Notre Dame given its name?

It was given its name as a tribute to the “Virgin Mary”, mother of Jesus.
Translated from the French, it means, “Our Lady”.
Notre Dame de Paris means Our Lady of Paris.
=================================================================
At Notre Dame in Paris:

Pope Benedict at the Courtyard of the Gentiles, full text

“…… I am grateful to the Pontifical Council for having taken up and extended my invitation to open a number of “Courts of the Gentiles” within the Church. This image refers to the vast open space near the Temple of Jerusalem where all those who did not share the faith of Israel could approach the Temple and ask questions about religion. There they could meet the scribes, speak of faith and even pray to the unknown God. The Court was then an area of separation, since Gentiles did not have the right to enter the consecrated area, yet Jesus Christ came to “break down the dividing wall” between Jews and Gentiles, and to “reconcile both to God in one body through the cross,

thus putting to death that hostility in himself”…..”

Talk about insanity!

This does not make sense and makes Jesus sound ridiculous.

He died on the cross to put to death his own hostility???

That is crazy!

It would help if they could reconcile

the obvious antithesis

of the 3 Synoptic gospels

to the Gospel of John!

What the want is a Universal Religion that includes anything and everything so that perchance they might by pure accident such as the Big Bang they might find the right answer somehow, someway.

The Pope admits above in his speech 

that he doesn’t know! 

Open up those vaults in the Vatican

and maybe we can help you figure it out!

 Obviously it – Notre Dame- is a Parrish since scribes are utilized to answer questions and discuss faith in an unknown God.

Funny that Perish and Parrish are words that sound alike yet vastly different meanings. So vastly and openly anti-Gospel of John as many other similar homonyms of the Synoptic Gospels in opposition to the Gospel of John: such as tarry-tares and so many other twisted examples and certainly not by accident!

AT NOTRE-DAME

Music is used to transcend.

Architecture is used to impress.

And obviously, it is run by the Jesuits!

The name itself Notre Dame meaning Our Lady is promoting

the adoration of Mary!

So their unknown God is obviously known to the people that promote this vast open space.

They have manufactured a Courtyard of the Gentiles at Notre Dame in Paris which is an

image of the vast open space of the Temple in Jerusalem

????????!!!!!!!  

Not only is the space open and vast it is also sacred?

“…… Believers and non-believers, as you stand in this court of the Unknown, you are also invited to approach the sacred space, to pass through the magnificent portal of Notre Dame and to enter the cathedral for a moment of prayer……”

Now in order to pray to God one has to pass through the magnificent portal

of Notre Dame?

That’s not what Jesus said in the Gospel of John.. He said that he was the way and implied he was the only way:

“No man cometh to the Father but by me.” and before that he said: “I am the way” and sometime in the gospel he said:

“Before Abraham was I AM”

which enraged some people in the temple.

 The Pope CHIMED:  “……. let yourselves be challenged by the beauty of the music……..”

  Give me a break! I think I will throw up! Did Pope Benedict produce this music? 

Remember when Pope Benedict’s brother George spit out his own teeth when the choir messed up? This was after his brother the Pope claimed his support and allegiance for a World Government With TEETH!

The Pope Calls For World Government With Real Teeth

Pope Remains Silent as Abuse Allegations
Hit Close to Home

1500 YEARS OF HOLY MUSIC AT NOTRE DAME

“…… In 1992, Notre-Dame de Paris’s Choir School underwent major change under the impetus of the Association for Holy Music at Notre-Dame de Paris.……”

What makes their music HOLY?

Does it have teeth?

Are there magnificent vast open spaces in their melodies?

Or does music become Holy when it

transcends 

or when you fall into a trance?

“…… Perhaps through this exercise, their prime role, that of bringing splendour to the services, the choirs, organists, choir masters and the cantor come close to reaching brilliant transcendence, which the visitor to Notre-Dame can rarely resist, whether they see it as God’s work or as human genius. These both humble and superb means give genuine soul to this grand building, created to lift humans upwards towards the absolute, the universal, and the sublime……..”

Again I want to upchuck!

 I like music, but this is ridiculous!

“…..In aesthetics, the sublime (from the Latin sublīmis) is the quality of greatness, whether physical, moral, intellectual, metaphysical, aesthetic, spiritual or artistic. The term especially refers to a greatness beyond all possibility of calculation, measurement or imitation….”

What if God doesn’t like the sublime or their choice of music,,,,what then?

It is quite obvious that they like their music, their portals, and their architecture and consider

themselves to be

HOLY and SUBLIME,

but does God consider them to be Holy and Sublime?

I would call them an

Aphrodisiac.

Do they serve oysters on the half shell?

How about vestal virgins?

When Moses saw the burning bush was there a magnificent portal, music and architecture or was he in the desert?

All the great people in the bible that we read about

were they accompanied by music, vast open spaces, and magnificent portals ?

I suppose Jesus walked around with a band playing behind him, trays of oysters, vestal virgins dancing to holy-ize the experience and put us in a trance so that we might believe?

I THINK ONE SHOULD READ ABOUT DANIEL WHO WOULD NOT BOW TO THE MUSIC NOR EAT THE FOOD

THAT THE KING SERVED!

Perhaps we should not eat what Pope Benedict XVI serves

such as:  Caritas in Veritate, Charity in Truth, Encyclical Letter of Pope Benedict, and Opus Dei and the speeches Pope Benedict XVI serves

“……One of the reasons for this Court of the Gentiles is to encourage such feelings of fraternity,

over and above

our individual convictions

yet not denying our differences…….”

THEY ARE ENCOURAGING BELIEVERS OF A KNOWN GOD TO BE FRATERNAL OVER AND ABOVE THEIR CONVICTIONS TO AN UNKNOWN GOD! BASICALLY TO BE DISOBEDIENT TO THEIR OWN BELIEFS AND BE INCLUSIVE WHICH THEY COIN AS FRATERNAL.

 SLITHERY AND SOOTHING LANGUAGE!

I CALL IT SEDUCTION!

Should the SCRIBES OF NOTRE DAME talk about all things such as

Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas?

1 Corinthians 3:21-23

21Therefore let no man glory in men. For all things are your’s;

 22Whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas, or the world, or life, or death, or things present, or things to come;

all are your’s;

 23And ye are Christ’s; and Christ is God’s.

How about Buddha, Qing David of Israel (Billy Grahams “Q source”),  Marie Laveau of Voodoo, and Queen Mary and the rest?

Listen to the words of Billy Graham a Roman Catholic spy giving a sermon:
“The Great Qing
(and then he stammered and said)
of Ancient Israel, David,
said on the death of Saul
who had been a bitter enemy…….”
Please watch and listen to Billy Graham at the beginning of his sermon:

Richard Nixon Funeral (8): Rev. Billy Graham’s message 1

=========================

This is hogwash,

but this is Roman Catholicism offering

anything and everything and the unknown god

because they don’t know

 and

They want to judge you

in their courtyard of the gentiles,

because they don’t want you to believe in the truth. They want you to join them in their confusion so they can keep you confused!

That is their talent! 

Tit for Tat….Judge not, lest you be judged!

and all that ROT!

Sculpture of Pope John Paul II decried as ‘ugly’

“Rome Mayor Gianni Alemanno, asked by APTN in an exclusive interview if the city might take down the statue, said public opinion would be considered.

“There’s an ancient saying: ‘Vox populi, vox dei,'” Alemanno said, using the Latin for “Voice of the people, voice of God.” “And from this point of view we cannot help but take into consideration the opinion of the public,” he added. “If public opinion consolidates around a negative opinion, we’ll have to take that into consideration.”

L’Osservatore Romano acknowledged that the statue is a modern work and called the city’s initiative to erect it “praiseworthy,” but added that “the statue’s sin” is that it is “hardly able to be recognized.”

Seems to me it would be appropriate to take the sculpture described in the article above to Paris and set it in the vast open space of

Notre Dame’s Courtyard of the Gentiles !!!

Tell No Man

Salute No Man

What say you Rome Mayor Gianni Alemanno?

========================

Jesus warned us:

John 5:43
I am come in my Father’s name, and ye receive me not:

if another shall come in his own name,

him ye will receive.

Jesus also warned Peter:

John 21:18-19

18Verily, verily, I say unto thee, When thou wast young, thou girdest thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not.

 19This spake he, signifying by what death he should glorify God.

And when he had spoken this, he saith unto him,

Follow me.

In the book of Acts, Peter fell into a trance ….which should alert you that he was visited by the another and in the book of Acts Peter is imprisoned and an angel releases him and he goes to another place.

Peter followed death, I think.

Then in the book of Acts Peter says that God is not a respecter of persons:

Acts 10:34

 34Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:

Not according to the following verses and there are more of them but I just included these to give you some examples:

Genesis 4:4
And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering:

Exodus 2:25
And God looked upon the children of Israel, and God had respect unto them.

Leviticus 19:15
Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honor the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour.

Leviticus 26:9
For I will have respect unto you, and make you fruitful, and multiply you, and establish my covenant with you.

2 Kings 13:23
And the LORD was gracious unto them, and had compassion on them, and had respect unto them, because of his covenant with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and would not destroy them, neither cast he them from his presence as yet.

However, there are verses that say the very opposite about respect from God such as in Deuteronomy and other books of the OT. This is a problem we have with the bible. If the holy books were taken by Josephus Flavius, as he claims they were at the time that the Romans burned down the temple in Jerusalem, then he very well could have altered them. He was hired by Vespasian Flavius to write propaganda and obviously the best place to do that would be the Holy Books of the Temple. Josephus Flavius also claimed that he took the Genealogy records of the Temple which is also a problem with the bible because the gospels of Matthew and Luke include genealogy for their identification of the Messiah. Supposedly those records were destroyed which means genealogy can no longer verify anything as far as who really is the Messiah – So basically their assertions about the genealogy of Jesus are meaningless……as if they didn’t know about this catch-22,

which of course they did know!

“…….According to Eusebius, Vespasian then ordered all descendants of the royal line of David to be hunted down, causing the Jews to be persecuted from province to province…….”

Vespasian

 If God is not a respecter of persons then why would anyone bother trying to obey laws, care for others, do the right thing, love one another, etc. Why would the Lord offer unclean animals to eat for Peter as represented in the Book of Acts? Do we eat camels? Do we eat hawks and buzzards? Why not? There are plenty of them around to hunt and eat. Why in the world would Jesus offer unclean animals to Peter AND TELL HIM TO ARISE, KILL, AND EAT and not only did he offer it…..he did it three times? What was the purpose? It makes no sense except to oppose what Jesus commanded Peter to do in the Gospel of John:
Feed his lambs and sheep.

Obviously, whoever Peter talked to

in his trance

was not Jesus of Nazareth the Son of God written about in the Gospel of John,

but was the ANOTHER that Jesus warned Peter, his disciples, and us!

This “ANOTHER” is very tricky, powerful, and evil!

Please read:

The Synoptic “Q Source”

John 21:15-17

15So when they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my lambs.

 16He saith to him again the second time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my sheep.

 17He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me? And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed my sheep.

and then Jesus told Peter:

John 21:18-19

18Verily, verily, I say unto thee, When thou wast young, thou girdest thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not.

 19This spake he, signifying by what death he should glorify God.

And when he had spoken this, he saith unto him,

Follow me.

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)

===========================

Abomination of Desolation

Abomination of Desolation Pt 2

THE PARABLE OF FAITH – PART ONE

The Covenant with Many

Josephus and His Footprints

Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST MAN)

The Monarch, Devil’s Breath, and the Eucharist


This entry was posted in Bible Contradictions, Bible Prophecy, Courtyard of the Gentiles, image of the beast, Jesuit, Notre Dame, Parable, Pope Benedict XVI, Pope John Paul II, Roman Catholicism, Roman Christianity, Synoptic Gospels, The Parable of the Mustard Seed, Uncategorized, voice of God, vox dei, World Youth Day and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s